Home

Primary links

  • Home
  • About us
    • Advocate
    • Members
    • Terms of Reference
    • Constitution
    • Membership rules
  • News
  • Resources
    • Funding
    • Research
  • Links
  • Muster
    • 2009
  • PlaceStories
    • Training
  • Media
  • Contact us


Home

Polycentricity, reciprocity, and farmer adoption of conservation practices under community-based governance

Submitted by LNSW on 3 December 2008 - 9:34am
  • Research

Summary of article:

Significant steps have occurred under Australia's 'regional delivery model' towards devolving responsibilities for natural resource management (NRM) to community-based regional bodies, particularly in respect of motivating farmers to adopt priority conservation practices. Challenges remain in effectively engaging the large populations covered by these bodies, especially with these bodies expected to assume responsibilities that risk them becoming perceived as extensions of government and favoring particular stakeholders.

In this article, I examine whether polycentric systems of collaborative community-based governance can help address these challenges. The examination involves double-censored regression analyses of data from postal surveys of farmers in three regions. The findings suggest that community-based approaches are capable under the regional delivery model of motivating greater voluntary cooperation from farmers than otherwise possible. They highlight the importance of farmers coming to adopt reciprocity strategies in their key institutional relationships under this model. It seems subregional bodies have an advantage over regional bodies in motivating such behavior from farmers because the former are better positioned to engage them sufficiently to turn around norms of free-riding or opposition entrenched by earlier paternalistic approaches to agri-environmental conservation. This indicates the value of a polycentric approach to community-based NRM wherein responsibilities are devolved to the lowest possible governance level consistent with the principle of subsidiarity. The economic dividend from increased voluntary adoption of conservation practices under this approach arises from the reduced transaction, political and other opportunity costs of achieving the same result through coercion or financial inducements.

How to access article:

Options 1 and 2 will work only if you have a personal or institutional subscription to the journal Ecological Economics. Otherwise jump to option 3.

1. Go to http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09218009 , click on "Articles in press" on left side of page, and scroll down to find the entry for "Polycentricity, reciprocity and farmer adoption ..." (which is today at the top of the list)

2. More directly (with apologies for the long address), you can download the pdf file from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6VDY-4V1C6SR-1-...

3. Contact Graham Marshall from the University of New England to have a copy emailed to you » gmarshal@pobox.une.edu.au

  • Login or register to post comments
  • Share/Save

Navigation

  • Recent posts
  • Login

Upcoming events

  • Schools Tree Day - National Tree Day
    30 Jul 2010 - 7:00am
  • National Tree Day
    1 Aug 2010 - 7:00am
  • Bird and Bug Day - Wirrimbirra Sanctuary - Bargo
    1 Aug 2010 - 10:00am
  • Last Call for Entries - 2010 Banksia Awards
    2 Aug 2010 - 12:00am
  • Florabank professional development training (Wagga)
    3 Aug 2010 - 9:00am
more

Calendar

«  

July

  »
M T W T F S S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
Add to calendar

PlaceStories

PlaceStories

Training now available to Landcare networks and other NRM groups.

» book now
Landcare NSW Inc acknowledges the generous support of:

Landcare Australia

Natural Resources Advisory Council

National Landcare Program

© Landcare NSW Inc 2010
RoopleTheme